Newsroom > News > Press Releases > Game design Q&A with Doris Rusch
May 8, 2018 /
Posted in: College of Computing and Digital Media /
A DePaul faculty member since 2011, Rusch has helped create
games such as “Blood Myth,” which examines living with sickle cell anemia;
“Soteria” and “Zombie Yoga” about anxiety; and “Perfection,” a game that
addresses the eating disorder anorexia nervosa. Her current project aims to help
players understand the mechanisms and emotional dimensions of emotional abuse
in intimate partner relationships. Rusch is the creative director for DePaul’s
Deep Games Lab, and in 2017, she won the 2017 Audience Choice Award for
“Soteria VR” at the Innovations in Psychiatry and Behavioral Health: Virtual
Reality and Behavior Change conference at Stanford University.
In this Q&A, Rusch explains why this medium is so
important, the process for creating a game, how games can be an avenue for
healing and what she hopes her games will accomplish once released.
Q: Why is it important
to you and the other researchers and developers in the Deep Games Lab to create
games for more than just entertainment?
A: Games are the
cultural medium of our century and we should use it for something. It's great
to have things that just entertain you, but there's so much more they can do
for you, so why not? Our games make one point and can really help conversation,
dialogue and empathy. I think that's totally worth doing.
Q: All of your games use
metaphors to help explain a disease or condition. Why is that the best
A: I wouldn’t
necessarily claim that it’s the best approach, but here are the reasons I tend
to embrace metaphors for my projects: One is to get people through the door, it’s
the sugar coat that hooks them and eases them into a difficult subject. The
other is you truly cannot depict deeper messages about how something very
abstract like loyalty or trust works if you don't use a metaphor to make it
concrete. Otherwise, you're telling a story and using examples, but you’re not
getting at the systemic aspects of these concepts, and that’s where games excel.
Arguably, games are intrinsically metaphorical and play is metaphorical because
it always represents something else. So for example, if we play house, it's
kind of a metaphor for being in a family household and everything that comes
with growing up and living together.
Q: What’s your
process for creating a game?
A: The process
depends on whether I pick a subject that I already have some personal
experience with or whether a client or stakeholder brings a subject to me. If
it’s personal, coming up with a metaphor is a very natural process. The
experience is already on my mind and to make sense of it, I’m playing around
with metaphors and systems all the time. What does it feel like? How does it
work? Images tend to just bubble to the surface that illuminate salient aspects
of the experience. Then I go from there and explore the image further.
I also use structural elements of games to get a grip on a
concept. What’s the goal, the win/lose state, the conflict? Sometimes there is
no goal. Or no win state. That tells you something about the kind of system
you’re modeling. As an example, making games about bipolar disorder or
attention deficit disorder, there is no clear “win state” as the illness can’t
be beaten, only managed. But eating disorder — as a more addiction-based issue
— can have a win state.
When I make a game about a subject that is brought to me, I
spend a lot of time talking to various experts, primarily people with lived
experience of the issue, but also doctors, family members, friends and others.
I’m trying to get as much of an understanding as possible about “what it’s
like” and the implications of the issue for personal life and social context
before I even think about a game or mechanics. Throughout the design process,
there is a lot of playtesting that involves subject matter experts. Especially
when I make a game on a subject I don’t have lived experience with. I want to
make sure those who do feel as accurately represented as possible.
Q: Can games be a key
A: It has to be
done very deliberately, very intentionally and very mindfully. It's not going
to solve all the problems. I think what is incredibly important to keep in mind
is you can't change anyone ever — and you shouldn't — without them wanting to
change. Change happens when both parties are ready, when there's a sender and a
receiver and they come together in a meaningful “meeting of the minds.” There
is a game and a player that come together at the right time and that game does
something, ignites a desire for change in the player. Maybe it does something
years later and we don't even know, we don't even remember what caused that
initial spark of transformation.
It's very comparable to how good books and movies work. Only
we wouldn't dream of asking for measurable change in regards to those media.
When I was a 13, I read J.D. Salinger's "Catcher in the Rye." I don't
remember filling out a questionnaire about how much more understood I felt in
my teenage angst. But that book changed me forever. I hope games can get away
from being instrumentalized and pushed in the corner of having to produce
measurable outcomes, just because they deal with themes of the human
experience. I think the key to transformation is emotional resonance, not
imposing some formula for change on the player.
Q: What’s your hope
for a game once it’s created?
A: My main hope
is that people who might benefit from them in one way or another play my games.
I know our games are not for everyone, and that they are not for every mood.
You’ve got to be ready for them and open to experience something that’s not
just entertainment. The target audience varies from game to game, of course.
For example, “Elude,” a game about depression, was
specifically designed to facilitate dialogue and increase understanding between
people with lived experience of depression and their friends and relatives. It’s
the dialogue that will deepen the experience and complete the game’s purpose.
The game in and of itself is only a conversation starter. “Soteria,” a game
about anxiety, was mostly made for people with anxiety disorder to promote
readiness to embrace being unsafe and uncertain. However, you don’t need to
have an anxiety disorder to benefit from the experience in some way. We all
have things we shy away from or don’t feel comfortable with. So, the actual
audience for it is broader than those the game was originally designed for.
More about the Deep Games Lab at http://depaulne.ws/deep_games_lab.
Media Contact:Russell Dornrdorn@depaul.edu312-362-7128